Blog

Current Projects and Ongoing Work

Science, Politics and Utopia in the Republic of Letters: Models of Producing and Disseminating Knowledge in Early Modern Europe

Project Manager: Vlad Alexandrescu

Financed by The National Autority for Scientific Research, through The Council of Scientific Research in Higher Studies in Romania, within the grant nr. 758/2009

In the last 20 years, a wide range of authors have started to question the cannonical view of a scientific revolution of the 17th century, have emphasized the historiographical gap existing between the historians of science and the historians of philosophy working on the same authors (and sometimes on the very same texts) of the early modernity. A dramatic process of revaluation, started more than 20 years ago, has changed considerably the field of early modern studies and the iconic image of the actors involved in the scientific revolution.

More


The Medicine of the Mind and Natural Philosophy in Early Modern England. A New Way of Interpreting Francis Bacon

ERC Grant 2009-2014

Principal investigator: Guido Giglioni (The Warburg Institute)

Co-investigators: Dana Jalobeanu, Sorana Corneanu (University of Bucharest)

Our project aims to provide a reappraisal of Bacon’s work and his legacy in the seventeenth century by focusing on a set of interrelated disciplinary contexts that, for reasons of interpretative and heuristic convenience, we have decided to call the early modern ‘medicine of the mind’. In doing so, we will be able to make sense of many aspects of Bacon’s work that still remain obscure and, as an added bonus, to clarify a number of long debated questions concerning seventeenth-century science and natural philosophy.

More

First workshop..

Princeton seminar: scientific utopianism

20 April-20 May, Princeton University

The international seminar on scientific utopianism, organised by prof. Dan Garber, Department of Philosophy will gather in Princeton a number of 10-12 researchers from 5 countries, working together on “Francis Bacon and the Scientific Utopianism”.

More about Dana Jalobeanu’ s part of the project you can find here.


The House of Solomon, philosopher- kings and the pedagogy of virtue: early modern utopias as pedagogical projects”.

Director of project: Dana Jalobeanu

Research project ID, financed by CNCISIS (2009)

More

New Europe College Seminars 2007-2008

The FME Seminars at the New Europe College this year continue with, roughly, two events per month. The Seminars are held by the FME team together with their guests and students. The presentations are following the FME general project this year concerned with the birth of modern physics in the seventeenth century.
Location: New Europe College, 21 Plantelor Street, Bucharest. If you are interested in participating, please send us a note.

Scheduled seminars:

November 2, 2007, 16:00

\”Francis Bacon\’s Redefinition of Philosophy\”
Proponent: Dana Jalobeanu.
Text: The Advancement of Learning.

November 23, 2007, 16:00

\”Bacon\’s Theory of Knowledge and the Limits of the Intellect\”
Proponent: Sorana Corneanu
Text: New Organon, Book I

December 14, 2007, 16:00

„Filosofie primă sau ştiinţa fiinţei? Subiectul şi obiectul metafizicii în secolul al XVII-lea”
Proponent: Lucian Petrescu

January 11, 2008

\”Descartes\’s Metaphysics\”
Proponent: Mihnea Dobre

February 8, 2008, 16:00

Subject: \”Mirodeniile înţelepciunii: rolul discreţiei în filosofia lui Pierre Charron\”
Proponent: Claudiu Gaiu (Paris I)

Metafizica, în secolul al XVI-lea, studiază fiinţa ca atare. Ce reţin este că secolul al XVII-lea produce transformarea cea mai notabilă în această disciplină de la începuturile ei aristotelice, şi că acum o serie de probleme pe care un aristotelician ortodox le-ar fi pus sub umbrela fizicii sînt considerate meta-fizice, dincolo de cele fizice. E vorba de pildă de problema uniunii psihofizice, tratată la Descartes în două domenii diferite, odată în cel fizic şi altă dată, într-un mod nu neapărat compatibil, pe teren metafizic, sau de chestiunea imortalităţii sufletului, problemă fizică înainte de a fi una teologică, strîns legată de problema individuaţiei substanţei spirituale. Ce am să fac este să prezint tabloul disciplinar în care se înscrie metafizica aşa cum se arată el în sistemul bine conturat al aristotelismului tîrziu şi să urmăresc transformarea principală ce se produce în filosofie în acest timp, anume trecerea de la studiul fiinţei în genere la studiul fiinţei aşa cum poate fi ea concepută, de la fiinţă la fiinţa gîndită, de la metafizică la ontologie. Polii vor fi Francisco Suarez pe de-o parte şi Johannes Clauberg de cealaltă, trecînd prin înţelegerea pe care cei mai importanţi autori continentali o au asupra metafizicii. Voi merge spre raţiunea întîlnirii noastre în cadrul proiectului comun, anume spre întrebarea cum se face că în mediile britanice metafizica dispare? Sau ce avem acolo în locul ei?

COURSE PRESENTATIONS

Early Modern Philosophy: Constituirea unui domeniu

Further reading:

Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, Edited by Tom Sorell, G.A.J. Rogers, OUP 2005

„Noua filozofie”, filozofie modernă, modernitate
Cum se constituie un canon şi ce putem găsi dincolo de el

  • Kant, « Ce este luminarea ? » şi ce era înainte
  • Voltaire şi « la saine philosophie » : cum se constituie un canon
  • Bătălia anticilor cu modernii : Fontenelle, Temple, Wotton
  • Glanvill versus Stubbe : Plus ultra şi citiri ale proiectului Baconian

INDIVIDUAL COURSES

Course 1

Shaping the \”Republic of Letters\”: The origins of modern ethos

Course proponents: Dana Jalobeanu, Sorana Corneanu
Course venue: Center for British Studies, Faculty of English, University of Bucharest

Every Wednesday, 17-20

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENTS:
The first meeting will take place Wednesday, 10 October.

SYLLABUS

COURSE MATERIALS

ASSIGNMENTS

week 2, 17 October: New Atlantis
week 3, 21 October: New Atlantis (contd.)
The first book of The Advancement of Learning
week 4: The Advancement of Learning, Bk I
week 5: Research seminar: The sects of the English Reformation

  • Calvinism
  • Lutheranism
  • Arminianism
  • Latitudinarians
  • Puritans

Materials worth seeing:

The article of Dictionary of the History of Ideas on Reformation

Very good materials on an excellent page on English and other reformations

Week 6 Bacon, The Advancement of learning II

Week 7: The theory of idols

Week 8: deadline for the abstracts

Week 9: Boyle, The Christian Virtuoso

Week 10: Science, religion and Royal Society

Week 11: Newton and the new science

Course 2

Philosophy, Science and Religion in the \”Republic of Letters: The origins of modern mind\”

Course proponent: Dana Jalobeanu
Course venue: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest

Every Thursday, 18-20

Discussion group:
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42879/*http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modernthought2007

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENTS

Vă rog să vă alegeţi o temă de lucrare şi să discutaţi cu mine bibliografia de pornire. Pe pagina care conţine sylabusul cursului aveti exemple de teme, prezentarea sistemului de evaluare etc.

Termen limită: 1 noiembrie

SYLLABUS

COURSE MATERIALS

ASSIGNMENTS

week 2: Kant, Ce este luminarea?
week 3: Joseph Glanvill, Plus Utra – see the following reading notes (seminar_glanvill)
week 4: Bacon, The Advancement of Learning, Bk I, Bacon, Noua Atlantida
Întrebări:
a. Care sunt, în viziunea lui Bacon, principalele impedimente în calea progresului cunoaşterii? (De ce nu ştim mai mult decât ştim?)
b. Care sunt posibilităţile şi limitările minţii umane?
c. Ce relaţie există între cunoaştere (învăţătură) şi mintea umană?
d. De ce scrie Bacon această carte? (întrebare valabilă pentru ambele cărţi 🙂 )

week 5: Bacon, The Advancement of Learning, Bk II

Întrebări:
a. Care sunt bolile de care suferă cunoaşterea şi cum pot fi ele vindecate?
b. Care sunt elementele unui program practic de reformă a cunoaşterii?
c. Care sunt domeniile deficitare ale cunoaşterii? De ce?
d. Care este imaginea despre universitate care se desprinde din The Advancement of Learning? Care sunt elementele unei critici a universităţilor?
e. Ce este filosofia?

week 6: Bacon, Ce este filosofia?

  • Bacon, The Advancement of learning, Cartea I si partea din cartea a II-a atasata mai jos.
  • Vedeti sumarul atasat la capatul acestei pagini

Week 7: Descartes, Discurs asupra metodei, Bacon, The Advancement of Learning (review)

a. Ce este filosofia?
b. Ce este filosofia naturală?
c. Ce relaţie există între domeniile filosofiei?

week 7: Bacon, Noul Organon, cartea I, Descartes, Meditaţii metafizice, 1-3

PRESENTATIONS (ppt)

curs1.ppt

Seminar_glanvill.doc

curs2.ppt

Aici gasiti niste notite de curs la materialul parcurs pana acum:

curs1.doc

curs2.doc

curs3.doc

curs4.doc

curs5.doc

curs6.doc

Readings:

Bacon, The Advancement of Learning, London, 1605

Bacon%20Adv05.pdf

Bacon, Progresul cunoaşterii, Cartea I, traducere şi note de Dana Jalobeanu (draft)

Advancement_cartea%20I.doc

Bacon, Progresul cunoaşterii, Cartea II, fragment (traducere şi note de Dana Jalobeanu, draft)


Advancement%20cartea%20II.doc

Bacon, Advancement, OUTLINE

Advancement_outline.doc

COURSE MATERIALS

PRIMARY SOURCES

The CDC courses have as their main aim to encourage and facilitate the acess to primary sources. All courses will discuss literature that is less discussed or less available or even completely unknown in Romania.

Even when we will discuss the well known philosophical treatises, we will place them in the intellectual context of early modern debates. Moreover, we encourage the students to look at the 17th and 18th century books in paralel with more modern editions. This page was designed to facilitate your access to less common bibliographical sources and a number of useful research tools. It will be regularly updated and the posted materials will be removed and changed, so download what you need as soon as you can.

Not all the materials provided here are for your own specific course. However, we have decided to put all the course materials on one page in order to give you an idea about the whole domain. You can also see what other students are doing. And we can change the page according to specific needs or proposals, so feel free to ask, react and comment on it.
This is an informative list of bibliographical sources and materials, as well as internet sites that might be of some help. It is designed to supplement the bibliography you will receive at course. Students are kindly encouraged to ask for the materials they need. Most of the materials indicated in the bibliographies can be found at the library of FME centre, or at New Europe College library.

IMPORTANT SITES:

Dictionary of the history of ideas
Gallica: bibliotheque nationale de la France
The Electronic Enlightenment
Schoenberg centre for electronic texts and images
The Archimede project
Electronic texts in philosophy (getting better and better every week)
Renascence Editions
Seventeenth century net.net
Catalogue of the scientific community in 16th and 17th centuries
CERES – Cambridge English Renaissance Electronic Service
Early Modern Resources

COURSES ON RELATED SUBJECTS

prof. Robert A. Hatch course on history of science and many interesting materials here
prof. Michael Mahoney course on the origins of modern science (Princeton)
A course on history and philosophy of science at Kyoto University, centered upon Leibniz-Clarke correspondence here

IMPORTANT LINKS:

History of philosophy
Francis Bacon: an interesting page with informations, primary texts and secondary literature (not always 100% creditable)
http://www.luminarium.org/
Some of Bacon\’s major texts here.
See the bibliography on Bacon on the page Individual Courses.

Descartes: texts in english and the Meditations in original and translation.

Leibniz: an interesting page with some primary texts here, Leibniziana (including CFP, who is who and interesting secondary references)

Isaac Newton:
Newton Project – a large and very successful project of digitizing Newton\’s manuscripts from Cambridge University Library. Its focus is upon theological manuscripts, but contains a large section of scientific manuscripts, books about Newton\’s philosophy written by his contemporaries. The volume of the digitized materials is growing every week.
Newton\’s Alchemy – a very interesting site with primary and secondary materials, including course materials and chemical experiences

Robert Boyle
Robert Boyle – a very good page containing primary and secondary materials, bibliography, CFP and what\’s new in Boyle\’s studies

History of Science

History of Science Society
History of Science – Internet resources
Internet History of Science Sourcebook

Cosmology, the new and the old world picture:
An interesting site with plenty of images here

Theology and history of religion

English Literature and Religion

A good starting point, comprehensive informations, some primary sources as well.

Fire and Ice: Puritan and Reformed Writings

An extremely good resources of primary texts on all aspects of Protestantism and the English.

King James\’ Bible

You might need to have a look in order to understand better quotations or debate within 17th century philosophy.

History of Political Thought

Most of the primary sources you need at the Online library of liberty
An interesting bibliography, primary and secondary sources of utopian thought here

A very large library of utopian thought on Gallica, Dosier Utopie.


COURSE READINGS:

See the bibliography indicated for each of the four courses. This section will list some of the materials that can be found online or the more rare materials students can only find in our electronic library. As a general rule, if you need some book or another, don\’t hesitate to ask!

Some course materials to download (check this section because it will change from one week to another)

VOLTAIRE, Lettres philosophiques, XII, XIV, XV, XVI

DIDEROT, De l\’interpretation de la nature, 1754 (Oeuvres, T.2)

Condorcet,
Exquisse d’un tableau historique des progres de l’esprit humain, 1795

See here, or here, or on Gallica.


Joseph GLANVILL, Plus Ultra, London, 1661

Glanvil_plus_ultra.pdf


Francis BACON, The Advancement of Learning, traducerea cărţii I (draft, traducere şi note de Dana Jalobeanu)

Advancement_cartea%20I.doc

Methods and Evaluation

METHODS

  • Teaching methods:

The course presents the subject in a thematic and original manner, focusing upon some of the most important philosophical debates of the seventeenth century and attempting to reconstruct the central questions behind such debates.

We have labelled our meetings “lecture-workshops” as an indication of their double nature: we do value the importance of the clear, substantial exposition of the lecture format, just as we appreciate the gains of interactive and student-led or student-tutor forms of class activity. Therefore, each meeting will generally consist of an expository part (usually ppt-based) punctuated by short feedback requests (approx. 1h) sandwiched in between an opening and an ending part devoted to interaction and debate (together approx. 1h). In the early stages of the course, we prefer short introductory brainstorming sessions, and questions and discussions at the end. As the course advances (starting with the 3rd or 4th meeting), we move into the workshop format proper, which will mainly consist in the organization of debates, since we consider this form of interaction crucial for the assimilation of the subject-matter of this course:

In this interactive or practical part of the course, the students will be required to imagine the way in which typical 17th-century debates took place, take stand on them and argue for or against a famous point of view in order to understand why it was so important to talk about issues like the powers of the mind, the limits of reason, the laws of nature or the relation between God and His creation in seventeenth-century thought. In such a way, the students will also understand that the key concepts and themes of debate in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were not restricted to disciplinary fields (our disciplinary fields) or specific currents of thought.

  • Assessment methods:

Since student participation in class debate is crucial for the success of this course, involvement in such critical discussion will figure prominently in the assessment percentage. This component will take the form of several types of task: preparation of conceptual stance established with tutor and defended in open debate; two short written essays on questions that emerge from class discussion; one group research project on topic of debate introduced in class. However, each of the five courses will propose specific methods of assessment, according to the background of the students, their level and the agreement between the professor(s) and the students.

AIMS AND TEACHING OBJECTIVES

  • The aim of this course is to enable students to develop competence in a particular thematic area, a specific historiographical approach, and a general way of thinking. That is to say, students taking this course are expected to become gradually conversant with the general problematic as well as the particular concepts relating to the origins of modern mind as bearing on the intersections of philosophy, religion, science and moral thought. They will also be expected to become competent in the highly contextual and historically sensitive way of doing intellectual history that is proposed by this course. And they will be expected to develop argumentative and critical skills as a result of the practice of debate proposed as a way of understanding the polemical context in which the issues discussed took shape.


  • In terms of more specific objectives, we expect students to be able to:
    • define and evaluate the main historiographical theses presented in the course (e.g. Koyre, Kuhn), as well as the major models for understanding the 17th-century frame of mind presented (e.g. Weber, Merton, Harrison, Shapin, Shapiro, Popkin, Oakley, Funkenstein);
    • give examples of issues in 17th-century thought which resist disciplinary separation and to justify the use of contextual intellectual history for dealing with such issues, by comparison with other available approaches;
    • synthesize most of the ways/senses in which the 17th century can be seen as a period of ‘crisis’ and ‘reform’ and as the ‘origin of modernity’, as well as be aware of other senses of such terms in other historical periods;
    • identify the various aspects and discuss the implications, of the relationship between science, philosophy and religion as it was formed in the 17th century, and judge the possibility of recuperating for today’s reflection some common ground between them;
    • recognise and develop the details of the relationship between moral and natural philosophy in the 17th century and be able to place it in the relevant historical and philosophical traditions;
    • define and place in relevant polemical context the major concepts discussed: e.g. belief, testimony, experiment, laws of nature, freedom, toleration, and consider the career of such concepts in subsequent periods up to today (their persistence/disappearance/migration from one domain of discourse to another);
    • identify major features of the persona of the philosopher and of the intellectual community as they were formed in the 17th century, and compare it with other such images, in the past or today;
    • develop communicative and critical thinking skills: a capacity to understand the various sides of one question, as well as to perceive what is at stake in a debate, and an ability to argue and persuade, both in oral and in written form, are objectives crucial for the subject matter, the teaching strategies and the general format of this course.

The Course

Course CDC 2007

Shaping the Republic of Letters:

Philosophy, Science and Religion

in early Modern Europe



General description of the project

This project envisages the introduction of a new course on the Foundations of Early Modern Thought into the curricula of several faculties and universities around Romania. The course will offer a new perspective upon traditional and completely new material will be research-oriented and context-related, will use new methods of teaching, problematizing and dialogue with the students. Most of the courses will be taught by two proponents, working as a team. The basic material and themes of the courses were established in common with the team of professors, but the individual syllabi will differ according to the level of the students involved.

Director of the project: Dana Jalobeanu

Members of the project: Sorana Corneanu, Catalin Avramescu, Sorin Costreie, Gheorghe Stratan

Universities involved: University of Bucharest, Western University “Vasile Goldis”, Arad, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj


The course

The course takes a highly interdisciplinary approach to the origins of modernity, conceived as a philosophical phenomenon with many implications in all areas of reflection, and hence essentially intertwined with the spheres of scientific, theological, and political thought, as well as with the formation and legitimation of lettered communities in what has come to be known as the early modern Republic of Letters. We take this Republic of Letters as one of the templates of modern Europe and through this course we endeavour to investigate, and invite academic reflection on, some of the fundamental concepts that have shaped European modernity, such as the notion of cultural crisis, the idea of reform, the strategies of epistemic scepticism and tolerance, the protocols of testimony and belief, the formation of scientific or intellectual communities, the ideal of religious and political toleration, the public image of the philosopher/intellectual.

The course we offer will differ substantially from the existing ones in conception, methods of teaching and general approach. What we want is to address primary texts, less known or completely unknown in Romania, in a problem-based fashion, pointing towards the formation of the intellectual community and its values, like freedom, tolerance, critical thinking, and constant communication. The course will focus primarily on some of the famous debates of the seventeenth century, looking at the way important ideas were shaped during such debates and emerged from correspondence, critique and various “battles of the books”. Its main purpose is to shift the attention from the history of philosophy understood as a list of authors and systems, to the history of philosophy understood as a battleground between ideas and values, an open confrontation of intellects having as an outcome what has been recently labelled “the origin of modern mind”. We hope to contribute in this way to the formation of a general attitude towards studying academic subjects in a more open, problem-based and argumentative way, using the history of ideas as an exercise of intellectual freedom.

COURSE JUSTIFICATION

In the last decade, the public space in Romania has hosted numerous debates concerning various issues loosely connected with ‘modernity’ and ‘post-modernity’ as well as questions as to whether there was such a thing as an Eastern European (or even Romanian) modernity. Yet, despite the wide interest inside or outside the academia, the question of the origins of modernity has not entered the regular academic curriculum. An equally debated topic, and one equally absent from the curricula, has been the relationship between science and religion, or, more broadly, science and the humanities: their overlapping areas, the possibility of dialogue between them, the idea of a common culture.

As students of early modern thought know, the two topics mentioned above are related in a substantial way, and they form one of the subject matters of a field of research long established in the West: intellectual history (a dynamic interdisciplinary field that combines the history and sociology of science, the history of philosophy, the cultural history of the circulation of ideas, and the social and material history of objects, practices and institutions). It is rather striking that in Romania one cannot hold a degree in, say, history of science, or that the history of philosophy is often taught without any background information or relation to a wider field like the history of ideas.

During the last 10 years, several attempts to institutionalize such a field have been done, some of them by the Research Centre Foundations of Early Modern Thought developed at the University of Bucharest. As a result, some new elective courses have been introduced (see my list of courses above). However, the field is still at the beginning and many things are necessary in order to develop it in a coherent way. Our proposal is to introduce a coherent package of courses developed around a common core of themes and methods and to offer such courses to several departments around the country, in the hope of making the first necessary steps towards the institutionalization of the discipline.

Our team is itself an interdisciplinary group, as it comprises a philosopher (Dr. Dana Jalobeanu), a historian of science (Prof. Gheorghe Stratan), a specialist in political philosophy (Dr. Catalin Avramescu) and a specialist in cultural studies and the history of ideas (doctoral candidate Sorana Corneanu), who are all specialised in early modern thought and who have a 5-year history of working together for projects, seminars and summer schools. We will offer this course in a number of different departments, for students coming from various backgrounds: history of philosophy and science, political philosophy, cultural studies. The course outline we present below is a master course we intend to adapt to the interests of each department by highlighting the relevant themes and discussions. Building on this common core, we will develop several variants of addressing the same questions. Common to all will be the corpus of texts to be studied and a common conception of the way in which the most important questions of modernity were shaped through debates and discussions between philosophers engaged in a common quest.

Beside the current lack of institutional support for such a discipline, the existing academic courses related to the field face their own shortcomings. One of the main problems in the Romanian curriculum is the way in which most of the courses on modern philosophy remain at the level of discussing secondary literature. There are rarely discussions of primary texts and even if these are sometimes discussed, they are taken out of the context and reconstructed in the crudest manner; in such a way that it is impossible for the students to understand what was really at stake in the construction of modernity, the modern mind or the modern frame of the world. This course addresses a widely discussed subject from a fresh perspective: focusing on debates and primary texts within contexts, it tries to problematize concepts, themes and some of the major questions that gave rise to modern thought. In addition, the course brings to the attention of students authors who are now rarely or never studied in Romania, some of whom were also never translated, despite their influence in the formation of modern mind.

Therefore, we think that the course is needed for the following main reasons:

  1. It introduces an interdisciplinary area of research which is currently lacking from Romanian academic curricula and can thus attune the latter with some of the latest Western developments in the area of intellectual history.
  2. In virtue of its network format, it can foster further collaboration among the departments where it will be taught and thus help enhance the future institutionalisation of this area of research across departments and disciplines in the Romanian academe.
  3. It offers an important conceptual gateway towards a historical understanding of topical issues in today’s debates: discussions of the shape and values of modern mind, or of the relationship between science, religion and philosophy, can be enriched by an awareness of their historical origins.
  4. By its approach and method, which proposes interdisciplinary investigation as well as critical thinking and debate, it will enable students to take a fresh and creative perspective on issues which, they will come to realise, are vital to their own insertion in the history of their world.
  5. Thanks to the same interdisciplinary and innovative character, it can form habits of thinking and lines of research that may impact on the way the traditional disciplines it relates to (philosophy, science, political science, theology, literary and cultural studies) are conceived and taught in the Romanian academe.
  6. Since it is a course that aims to compete in both content and method with similar lines of research and teaching at European universities at the moment, and since it will be taught in English, it may be taken to other centres outside Romania, in view of international networking.

Course CDC 2007

Shaping the Republic of Letters:

Philosophy, Science and Religion in early Modern Europe


Grant
financed by the Curriculum development programme of the Central European University Budapest.

The CDC grant envisages the introduction of a new course on the Foundations of Early Modern Thought into the curricula of several faculties and universities around Romania. The course will offer a new perspective upon traditional and completely new material, will be research-oriented and context-related, will use new methods of teaching and dialogue with the students. The basic material and themes of the courses were established by the team members but the individual syllabi will differ according to the level of the students involved.

Director of the grant: Dana Jalobeanu

Course 1: Shaping the Republic of Letters: Origins of modern ethos
MA in British Cultural Studies, Department of English, University of Bucharest
Proponents: Dana Jalobeanu, Sorana Corneanu
Language: English

Course 2: Philosophy, science and religion in the Republic of Letters: The origins of the modern mind
Faculty of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest
Proponents: Dana Jalobeanu
Language: Romanian

Course 3: Shaping the Republic of Letters: images, representations and metaphors of knowledge in Early Modern Europe
MA in the study of theory and practice of image, CESI, University of Bucharest
Proponent: Dana Jalobeanu
Language: Romanian

Course 4: Shaping the Republic of letters: ideas and ideals of Early Modern Europe
MA in European Ethnology, Western University “Vasile Goldis”, Arad
Proponent: Dana Jalobeanu
Language: Romanian

Course 5: Political Philosophy: Foundations of European Modernity
Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Bucharest
Proponent: Catalin Avramescu
Language: English

SECOND SEMESTER

Course 6: History of Scientific Ideas: Foundations of Early Modern Science

Doctoral School, Faculty of European Studies, Doctoral School of European Studies, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj Proponent: prof. Gheorghe Stratan Language: Romanian

Course 7: Getting the Mind Right: A History of the Passions in Early Modern England


Elective course offered to 3rd- and 4th-year students, English Major and Minor,
School of Foreign Languages and Literatures
University of Bucharest

Language: English

Proponent: Sorana Corneanu

Course 8: Foundations of Early Modernity: Shaping the modern mind

Elective course offered to 3rd year BA in International Relations and European Studies, Faculty of Humanist and Political Sciences, Western University \”Vasile Goldis\”, Arad

Language: Romanian

Proponent: Dana Jalobeanu